#38120
Jimmy-T
Keymaster

    I don’t understand what the problem is here, apart from the SM suggesting that the owner might want to send a lawyer’s letter (which is valid advice and will probably not make any difference).

    What I see here is a strata manager responding to an owner by stating the facts, admittedly by shifting the responsibility away from themselves (which is also valid, since it’s the secretary and committee that sets the date).

    Is your issue with strata managers dealing directly with individual owners?  Many strata schemes wish their strata managers would do that.  Are you saying the strata manager is colluding with this owner?

    Actually, I’m not at all sure what you are saying. Perhaps you could reword your question more specifically: what’s the issue and what do you want as an outcome would be the start. What would you have hoped would have happened in this instance?  When you say this isn’t the first time such things have occurred, what other issues have there been?

    On another matter entirely, the original version of this posts had dozens of lines of coding from the cut-and-paste of the email. This is something we get a lot.

    This is a message to all Flatchatters: Please clean up your posts of all that excess coding when you can. It is ugly, confusing and may result in your post being deleted.

    The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.