#52721
TrulEConcerned
Flatchatter
Chat-starter

    Thanks for the reply Jimmy.

    CODE: As I understand you, this may be unworkable and have no effect when compared to it not coming into existence because there is no legislated requirement for the SC to read correspondence.

    BY-LAW

    As to the By-law, I would expect short, sharp and relevant correspondence from an owner would be read and if needed, acted upon by the SC. Whilst reams of BS sent by an owner would be (rightly) left unread. Other than trying to inject fear into some owners, I don’t understand the point of such a By-law.

    You mention the possibility that “property values are being detrimentally affected”. Do you think potential purchasers of a lot when searching the records may be put off by what they may interpret as owners being muzzled?

    Thanks again for your insights.