#54989
kaindub
Flatchatter

    The recent landmark judgement about dogs in apartments has wide ranging implications. The judges said that within your lot one is allowed to do as one pleases (of course within reason).
    How far does one extend the not keeping within appearances bylaw. If everyone is growing roses, and you choose rhodedendrums, is this not keeping with appearance?
    If everyone installs a pergola and one lot owner installs a sun umbrella, is that not in keeping with the appearance.

    The usual by laws in NSW say in keeping with the appearance.

    I think the interpretation of constant appearance is highly subjective, and I stand by my initial position.