#57047
TrulEConcerned
Flatchatter
Chat-starter

    Thanks for the reply and your patience Jimmy.

    I regret that my post was clumsily written. I am not attempting to revisit an exhausted issue. For argument’s sake, I will put aside the absence of the records.

    As mentioned, the change in the same by law (that refers to Damage to Common Property) has been to remove  the words

    “Despite s.106 of the SSMA 2015”

    I would like to know if the meaning of this by law over time is unchanged: that is, the OC owns certain assets but responsibility to maintain them has always been and currently is for the lot owner’s account.

    That is how I read the bylaws. Or am I missing something?