#59909
scotlandx
Strataguru

    I could be wrong but I have had a look and found a recent Tribunal decision with facts that are very similar to the case presented here – not the same but similar. It is a very complex case. If it is that case then there are a number of things that have been left out of the question, and the decision is different to that represented. For example the decision did not say the works were not to be removed, but a 12 month period has been set for consideration of a number of issues before any decision regarding possible removal can be made. Some of the works are subject to a Council stop order.

    It may be that this is a different case, but if it is the same case I suggest it would be helpful to be more accurate in the representation of the issues.

    In any event the answer to your two questions, as general principles, remains the same.