› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Strata Committees › Committee about to misspend money despite warnings › Current Page
I wonder if it’s as clear cut as you say? The body corporate has a responsibility to maintain the common property, and the walls, floor, ducts, ventilation and plumbing in each apartment is common property, and is where vermin and pests live and spread.
The pest controller will need to access apartments to treat these areas, and if a mouse chews through an NBN cable inside an apartment, the body corporate would be at fault for failing to have controlled the pests. In fact, as said earlier, for a proper pest control treatment to protect common property there will need to be application done inside each apartment, as well as around the more accessible common property areas.
That’s why commonly the body corporate will subsidise the treatments inside apartments, because the treatment benefits the building as a whole as well as the owner of the apartment, and it is hard to quantify who benefits the most. But I think it is wrong to assume that the treatment inside an apartment only benefits that owner, and they must pay for it entirely. The building as a whole benefits when pests are eliminated and cannot spread. So if you take action as you plan, the body corporate could make a good case that if was to the general good to carry out treatments throughout the building.
If working out how to divide the costs between owners and the building is too hard, then it is reasonable that the building covers the whole cost. You need to check the scope of the work – if it says that the pest control is to concentrate on treating pests that interfere with the common property, and spread between apartments, then you may not have much of a case.