One thing comes to mind: why was the subject of sacking the strata manager listed for the AGM?
It could have and should have been dealt with at a general meeting, without the presence of the strata manager, as many simple general meetings are.
Some years ago, one strata I am involved with (not as closely as I am with others) had a committee member agitating to sack the strata manager. I really was not too intimate with that strata scheme, so I went with the flow. Maybe it was a personality issue or fraud. I don’t know and I do not recall chapter and verse being given to the committee.
The committee arranged a general meeting 2 months prior to the AGM, the latter was always run by the strata mgr. At the in person general meeting (it was some years ago before ZOOM etc), the only motion was to sack the strata manager and the procedure ie what sections of the SSM Act applied was listed verbatim.
The motion was carried.
At the AGM the chairman reminded the strata mgr of the general meeting’s resolution and formally dismissed the strata mgr at the AGM, notwithstanding the strata mgr still acted for several more months as per his contract.