Jimmy wrote that
I am pretty sure that I have read in the past about Members rejecting cases because the plaintiffs appeared to be changing horses in mid-stream. It’s much better to go in with a clear objective of what you want…
I may have been unclear. I do not suggest to change strategy midstream. I am however suggesting that, as Jimmy opines, “to go in [to NCAT] with a clear objective” and that while you go to NCAT with a clear objective, you may be unsure which order is exactly the most appropriate one NCAT will want to refer to, so list all those orders that assist your position.