› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Parking Peeves › Persistent by-law breaches by tenants › Current Page
S, I noticed the term ‘No eviction by Owners Corporation’ in your link to the Tenants Union.
But, that is not legislation. I would like to find that.
The link to the legislation states the Tribunal MAY order termination. It doesn’t state that only the Tribunal may order a termination.
I don’t see how termination would be harsh, unconscionable or oppressive when that tenant outright refuses to comply with some by-laws. This tenant even ignores any communication from the Owners Corporation and only communicates with the leasing agent. Also, what about the tenant staying and causing a harsh, unconscionable or oppressive environment to other residents due the non compliance of by-laws.
David Ng, thank you for your comments. I agree that a termination notice by a tenant during a fixed term may attract a break fee, but the landlord may waive that fee to get rid of that tenant.
Usually such behaviour extends into the periodic term of a lease when the there would be no break fee.
But my original question was – would that by-law be an illegal one and would a tribunal strike it down?