It doesn’t sound like it will make any difference in your circumstances since one owner of multiple lots gets a vote for each of those lots. In this case it sounds like the “original owner” is actually using trust funds to avoid having their voting power reduced to one-third because they still own more than 50 per cent of the lots. You might try running that argument under current law – if you have the time, patience and deep enough pockets.
A better idea might be to build a compelling case of serious mismanagement and then apply for the appointment of a statutory manager.