#72786
Jimmy-T
Keymaster
Chat-starter

    Good point on submissions.  How can they claim to represent owners when they never publicly advocate for them? I’m sure that SCA would argue that all their submissions would benefit strata owners because anything that’s good for them is good for everyone involved.  Poppycock, obviously, but that wouldn’t stop them saying it.

    Some of us can remember when the SCA’s predecessors, the ISTMS, threatened to sue owners corporations if they tried to modify its one-sided contracts, on the grounds that they were “copyright”.

    It was a cartel then and nothing has changed except that it is now officially a “profession” – which only means it has a different code of conduct to ignore.

    The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.