@ The Hood
I recall the case you mention and agree with your interpretation.
@Kaindub you wrote
If I was on this committee, I would limit the people who have access to the legal documents to those who are running the case. Usually one or two people are elected to speak with the lawyers.
What you do not want is an associate of the aggrieved lot owner to access legally privileged documents and pass that to the aggrieved owner.
I see your point, but doubt you have any lawful right to deny anyone not involved in the legal proceedings from accessing the documents. Unless, possibly, if those who you denied are not helping foot the OC’s legal bills.