Reply To: Alterations and conflicts of interest

Just to claify, the change was not to common propery, the change was to a free-standing unit in a B-class development (ACT).  Does this change any answers?

In relation to why not for (iv), because in many areas of governance law and practice, if someone is to benefit financially from a decision then they should not participate in making that decison.  An owner of a unit who is also the part-owner of a building company that would benefit from a decision to appove a building modification is in such a position.  But I can’t see anything in the relevant Act that requires them to excuse themselves.