Reply To: Intrusive CP lighting and NCAT

Update: OP turned up with a lawyer during the directions hearing. I objected on the basis of factual nature of the case and added complexities plus costs because of the legal representation. The senior member coincided with my reasoning and asked if the matter can be settled today. I was not prepared for this but gave verbal evidence (had substantiative evidence to back my claim as well) but was not hoping I would be asked to represent in directions hearing. I was very reasonable in my demands.  Respondents had no leg to stand on and could only come up with safety and security issues. I wanted to respond to this but the member threw this claim out the window and said plaintiff is asking for reasonable able adjustments not removal. Got the orders in my favour.