#22366
alinka
Flatchatter
Chat-starter

    Thank you Jimmy for your valuable advise.
    Do you mind to advise me further please?

    The strata manager is already getting quotes from two strata lawyers. As he informed the OC, he will than forward the quotes to the newly elected EC, who should than decide, who to engage.

    The problem is that at the AGM through the poll voting the pro-group blocked other owners to be on the EC. It means the pro-work group will decide.
    As I mentioned before, they insist to have the legal advise before the mediation, which is already logged and was postponed from the 22.9. to a further date.
    Who shall the opponents turn to, to ask that the pro-work group should pay for the legal advise and when shall we do it; after or before the legal advise is obtained? Do we need to inform the strata manager/EC secretary about our intention or do we need to go to the NCAT regarding this?

    Also they forced at the AGM through the poll voting the EGM minutes to be altered to “change of the balustrades is not a repair (as they were claiming before) but a maintenance as it doesn’t meet the requirement of the current BCA”. Could this have any influence what kind of resolution is required when they are now talking about maintenance and not repair?

    Thank you for your advise
    Alinka