#13824

JimmyT said:

It's not spelled out in the Act but it has been a recent Supreme Court interpretation of the Owners Corporation's legal responsibility to maintain common property regardless of how, why or by whom it has been altered or damaged. 

I'll try to find the case if I can but I'm assured that this is the case.

Hi Jimmy

If you could find the case, that would be wonderful.

Once again, thanks for your comments.

Makinson