› Flat Chat Strata Forum › By-laws and outlaws › Breaching exclusive use by law › Current Page
25/02/2013 at 7:33 pm
#17919
My friend said it was an exclusive use but could just have been a special by law for this pergola. This by law does state that the owner of the property is responsible for any ongoing maintenance. I would think that some kind of by law or permission would be needed as most pergolas are attached to the external common wall/common propert in one way or another.
But I’d they have a by law that states they are responsible for it for one thing and they build something else, and no one can be bothered to do or say anything about it, is it still covered by the by law if it differs from the original plans?