Re: Building on exclusive-use common property

Thanks for your answers. The El Khoury case sound reasonably relevant and that definitely concerns me:

If the OC pays for the structures to be removed and reinstated and the structures once reinstated aren’t as effective as they were previously (i.e. leak, move/squeak/groan in the wind etc), who needs to take responsibility? How far does that responsibility go? What happens if the structure is still under a warranty and this voids the warranty….I could go on. 

Seems a very tricky situation.