#18327
newlsie
Flatchatter
Chat-starter

    Thank you Whale and Kiwipaul,  We have had a set back.  Our EC consists of 5 people and 3 of them have now decided that on behalf of all owners the original agreement at the 2010 AGM should be revoked and as they have the majority vote they have decided to hire a lawyer on behalf of the OC to fight the CTTT orders. They called an EC meeting and proposed this but the SM did not call for a vote – we just discussed the problem.  So on Tuesday they hired a lawyer.  Now more than 1/3rd of the 36 owners have written in to the SM to say that they oppose to this spending of owners money as this does not represent some their view.

    What is our legal position here.  

    1.  Can these 3 EC members hire the lawyer if no vote was called for at the meeting?

    2.  If more than 1/3rd of the owners object to this spend must they stop?

    Thanks for your advice, Jan