@JimmyT said:
Why have you underlined and bolded “one”? What is the significance?
It sounded like an EGM was imminent but not yet called, so in the interest of not being out-manouvered, one owner could submit the motion, then round up the 25% needed to call the EGM.
Alternatively, if the 25% have all agreed the motion, it could be submitted with the requisition for the EGM.
And in case he couldn’t get the 25% for an EGM, it would still be on the agenda for the next AGM.
I totally agree that “batting order” is also important, but not controlled under the Act. I know of one Chairman/Secretary who, if a motion is received from an owner, will always write his own version and put it earlier on the agenda so that he can then rule the other owner’s motion as “out of order – already resolved”.