mini – divergent opinions are always welcome, but in fairness I did say that a case mounted under Sect 183 would be a bit of a stretch, as might I add would one under Sect 158 1(c) in circumstances where hornyhombre‘s issue is that the Plan’s exclusive use by-law doesn’t include maintenance conditions; unjust or otherwise.
Point taken with the Application Form; I should have linked THIS one.
In conclusion, I come back to my original observation that Owners Corporations should always think long and hard before considering any Motion to grant exclusive-use privileges!