› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Strata Committees › Executive Committee policy › Current Page
I would like to say thanks to those who have passed comment on the “EC policy.”
To Gilgal1 i would say it is indeed astonishing that the EC would ration replies. This clause of the policy is to “empower” the Secretary to ignore certain people and certain issues. The beautiful part is that the Secretary receives a $1500 honourarium for ignoring certain people and certain issues.
To Jimmy i would say well picked up. An EC member cannot just be shown the door because they miss a few meetings. This clause of the policy was included to target specific EC members who sometime do not come to meetings because they feel bullied and powerless in the face of the dominant element in the EC. The interesting part of this clause is that when an EC member did miss 3 meeting there was no talk of invoking the policy because of which EC member it was who failed to attend the 3 meetings.
I would say that if an OC is passing this type of policy at an AGM then all is not well ….. and that is indeed the case.
I will mention the policy was passed by a large OC and so the clauses relating to meeting notifications (11 and 12) leave a lot to be desired.
It has proven impossible to bring about change in the SP which has this policy. Owners are either a part of implementing such a policy or they do not participate in the AGMs. CTTT have virtually endorsed everything going on in the SP in question. The AGM has flatly refused to engage management.
People are heading for the exit turnstile and i feel there should be a better option than selling when owners are faced with unreasonable rabbles running SPs …. regrettably there isn't.