› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Strata Committees › How do I confirm that a nominee has been correctly nominated? › Current Page
This election process is systemic and goes back at least 10 years. We have had several rouge chairmen that wrongly think that by achieving the dizzying heights of chairman they are the CEO of a multi-national. Most coming from the pubic sector or big corporate and have finally found their nirvana. The current chair has dressed down several owners, is a bully, I think most psychologists would use the N or P words.
I have researched the last three committees:
2015/16 7 members, 2 sole owners, 5 co-owners, 1 possibly in-financial (would be owner if financial, attended just 1 out of 12 meetings).
2016/17 9 members, 1 sole owner, 8 co-owners.
2017/18 9 members, 1 sole owner, 8 co-owners (same as previous bar 1)
Now, if they all resigned they would have to do so one or two at a time in order to maintain a quorum that could co-opt them. The mind boggles, if they (8) all resigned together there would be just one owner, a dictatorship.
Seriously, this could be the smoking gun we need and actually reduce the SC back to around 5 that has been the norm until this mob have taken control.
Further, it brings up the question, not unlike what is going on in Canberra at the moment, that items that recent SC’s have done without taking the items to the owners could be overturned.