#20829
Jimmy-T
Keymaster

    Cosmo is right, that ship has sailed but you can put another boat in the water (to extend the analogy).

    You could try to have a letter to the EC correcting the minutes adopted as a matter of record (best of luck with that).  Or you could wait until your next general meeting (probably your next AGM) and put up a motion that the minutes of the specific meeting be noted as suspect and misleading.  

    You motion has to be added to the agenda (if you get it in before the agenda is issued) and you are entitled to add an explanatory note to that motion which will also go on the record, even if the motion is defeated.  That way you have recorded your dissent and it is a much fresher record than months-old minutes of a meeting everyone has forgotten.

    Just to twist the knife, you could propose a motion that the in future the EC minutes must not be issued until they have been approved by all members of the EC.  I know what the argument against that will be – there is no time if they are to fulfil their statutory duty of issuing the minutes within two weeks (??)  –  but the very fact that the motion is there means everyone will be alerted to the fact that there is a problem with the minutes.

    The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.