#13623
imported_dech
Blocked
Chat-starter

       

        If I could meet Miss Appropriation maybe I'd stop worrying – but I'm more a Laura Norder guy – however thank you for the responses.  

        If the Act exclusively requires the OC to alter common property then if some other entity – such as a dominant EC get their hands on the money then it smells a lot like theft; they might say that you would never get more than 25% to oppose even if they proposed building a landing site for aliens at great expense but this rules out the possibility that if reasonable objections are raised often enough a couple of investors could be aroused. 

        If they spend say a thousand dollars on a nice garden Buddha statue one might not be overly concerned (except on principle) but a thousand dollars on say tearing up a garden because EC members don't like certain plants is a bit harder to stomach and on paper it could just appear as something innocuous sounding like “tidy garden at northern side” – which would be another breach – it's hardly a “detailed agenda” as required by the Act unless some indication of expenditure is included.