dech said:
…….. on paper it could just appear as something innocuous sounding like “tidy garden at northern side” – which would be another breach – it's hardly a “detailed agenda” as required by the Act unless some indication of expenditure is included.
Hi Dech,
“Detailed agenda”; what a concept.
My SP has for years (about 5) had agendas that are one word or two word items. Of course this is not a detailed agenda but it gets better.
The EC will have say 5 or 6, one or two word, items on the agenda and none of that will get dealt with at the meeting and instead 5 or 6 motions will get introduced and the first things owners know about anything is a set of EC minutes a week or so later; with a similar agenda for the next meeting. It has been going on for years.
It has all been to CTTT, twice, CTTT was sent 3 years worth of EC minutes as evidence and the end result was dismissal.
“Tidy garden at northern side”; that is 5 words and more detail than owners here get and it wouldn't matter if owners here did get 5 word agenda items because the agenda is not the business of the meeting in this SP.
The agenda for the next EC meeting here has 5 items; 3 are two word items, one is a 3 word item and the other is a 4 word item. None of that matters because you can bet your life there will be introduced matters. A recent meeting made 5 resolutions and not one was from an agenda item; the agenda might as well have been a blank piece of paper.
Send enough applications to CTTT and you will learn nobody at CTTT really cares about what is in the Act. Is your SP seriously dysfunctional is all that matters and not getting a detailed agenda and the EC blowing a few grand on self serving gardening are hardly matters that warrant action from our inept strata overlords.