#13671
Billen Ben
Flatchatter

    Billen Ben said:

    dech said:

       

       …….. on paper it could just appear as something innocuous sounding like “tidy garden at northern side” – which would be another breach – it's hardly a “detailed agenda” as required by the Act unless some indication of expenditure is included.

    Hi Dech,
    “Detailed agenda”; what a concept.
    My SP has for years (about 5) had agendas that are one word or two word items. Of course this is not a detailed agenda but it gets better.

    ……….
    The agenda for the next EC meeting here has 5 items; 3 are two word items, one is a 3 word item and the other is a 4 word item. None of that matters because you can bet your life there will be introduced matters……

     

    Hi Dech,
    Although this goes a little outside the garden issue and the apparent use of money by EC members to pursue what amounts to personal agendas i just though i would update you on the concept of a detailed agenda.

    As i state above the next EC meeting here has 5 items blah blah blah.
    The meeting has been held and there were 20 introduced motions and the 5 items on the agenda did not rate a mention. (and i can't get an order to correct this, CTTT just does not care about it)

    If you get some innocuous sounding agenda item then think yourself lucky because at least there is a hint of what is going on.