Totally agree, JT. This will make for an interesting ‘test’ case.
Regarding the appearance of the building v child safety …. I guess the issue is whether if “Strata owners are legally entitled to prioritise building aesthetics and property values over children’s lives.” is it reasonable to do so?
We also have the dilemma of whether by-laws are “harsh, unconscionable or oppressive” if they fail to prioritise child safety?
See this article by Dr Sherry: https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/head-20160102-gly5r3.html