With you on that, Lady P, but I wonder if the problem is Sub-section 2: “Any such locking or safety device, screen, other device or structure … must have an appearance, after it has been installed, in keeping with the appearance of the rest of the building.”
I suspect it’s the appearance of the net that’s bugging other owners, and the allegations about drilling into the waterproofing are assumptions they are not entitled to make, but have done so to boost their claim.
It’s a mess.
By the way, some of you may have noticed that the original poster’s screen name has changed. That’s because, despite all our requests not to do so, she has used her own name, leading to the identification of her, probably her neighbours and her strata manager.
It’s a pain – I wish people would just read the notes before they post. We can only have open and free discussions if anonymity is protected.