Judge Kangaroo (from the Kangaroo Court) decides in favour of JT.
If you are “entitled” to vote by virtue of being an Owner, but don’t attend the meeting nor send a proxy, your vote is not cast.
If you are “entitled” to vote by virtue of being an Owner, but you or your proxy abstains, your vote is not cast.
As the Act is worded in terms of “cast”, then I can’t see the alleged difference between 75% or more of UEs cast in favour = pass, and more than 25% of UEs cast against = fail.