#25072
Jimmy-T
Keymaster

    @Whale said:
    Jimmy T. may want to untangle the mess that you’ve created (because I can’t), but on the subject of an Owners Corporation’s (O/C) personal property…..
     

    Yes, I am confused too.  It seems to me that we have a situation where some units have pergolas and some don’t.  Some of the existing pergolas are common property and some aren’t, although all of them have been maintained as if they were common property.  

    Now the owners corp has passed a special resolution absorbing the  non common property pergolas into the common property.  Why? Perhaps it’s just to stop squabbling.

    Certainly the people who don’t have pergolas have a right to feel aggrieved if they are just legitimising costs that shouldn’t be charged to the OC.  And that is the nub of the argument – not whether or not pergolas are personal property.

    If the existing common property pergolas are not accruing additional levies through higher Unit Entitlements the Non-Pergola (NP) owners are being cheated.  The fact that  non common property pergolas were being maintained means everyone else was being cheated.

    The simple answer is to seek dispute resolution through NCAT (Section 138) whereby everyone who has a pergola has to pay for its upkeep one way or another and those who don’t have one don’t have to pay.  This might however result in a recalculation of Unit Entitlements and that’s another can of very wriggly worms.

    The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.