@AJP said:
The two storey townhouses are outnumbered by single storey villas in the complex and they could vote it in next time he brings it up because it doesn’t effect them. I really do not want another lock on my windows, especially the one the SM is pushing for, as my vertical drapes wouldn’t sit flat and would catch on it when they are opened and closed.
I still believe you are correct and having to install a second lockable device is ridiculous. So advise the other owners that you won’t be paying because it’s common property and Strata are liable for the cost of an unnecessary device. Also as the device is not required before 2018 the act might be repealed or changed before then.
If they still pass the motion inform the SM that unless he obtains an adjudication ruling you will not permit access to your property to have this extra device installed and ask them to minute this refusal. If they take it to adjudication it will cost thousands (if SM runs with it and the strata will have to pay). Even if you loose they cannot claim the costs back from you and it will cost you virtually nothing except to write a letter stating that you already have locks on the windows and extra locks aren’t required.
You will only be possibly liable for costs if you refuse to comply with the adjudication order which at worst will tell you to allow the locks to be fitted.