› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Proxies – blind faith or good sense? › Proxy Disributed with Answers included! › Current Page
Sorry- I understand the confusion having re-read the post.
The original meeting in February (attended by the 3) was undertaken in the front foyer of the building and did not achieve anything and was not handled correctly procedurally: No previous minutes were provided to ratify, no documentation of a proposal from the “new” strata managers was provided and no notice of 3 months was included in the motion to terminate current managers (which would place us in breach of contract. He also failed to mention he held any proxies regarding the motion to change. At the time we agreed not to record any decision and allow the current strata manager (which had recently merged with another firm so we effectively have a new manager already) time to prove their worth. Unfortunately, as usual, the instigating member of the EC has either forgotten or reevaluated this decision following the meeting.
He is now trying to get the motion placed again on the upcoming AGM agenda, which is not a problem- he’s entitled to try again, even if it is the 4th attempt and doesn’t have the numbers required. No, what we want to investigate is having this man removed and excluded from the EC (preferably for the foreseeable future) as the paper trail generated by his constant vexatious actions and inability to understand and follow strata governance procedures is causing considerable angst and devaluing our properties.
I know we need 75% of owners to agree to remove a member of the EC but have never had more that 50% attend any meeting. Thus I was asking the process to remove via some sort of signed declaration.