Costa said … I think I sense a terseness..
No… I wasn’t being rude or unfriendly, but rather using your term perhaps inappropriately to express my frustration with the fact that your questions had been answered, good advice had been given, and yet you had come back with substantially the same questions perhaps expecting a different answer (?).
You’re not the only one by the way!
Anyway, at least you’re happy with the new E/C Member even though it’s not you, and as the last few posts illustrate, there is as you’ve observed some inexactness around interpretations of the Act – but at least that keeps the Tribunal occupied whenever one of those oft-used (interpretations) suddenly doesn’t “work” for a particular Plan.