#14481

considerate band fair said:

Hi Jimmy, as you said on ABC radio the other day, our childrens safety is of the utmost importance, but there is also a regard to the appearance of a building. We all want our children to be safe.  But we also invest a lot of money and time in buying into well kept and attractive buildings and keeping up the appearance of said buildings. For our own satisfaction and of course to keep the value of our property. If there was perhaps a more attractive alternative that is not such an an eyesore and is not at all intrusive or detracts from the buiding perhaps there would be more interest. There will be so many variances, older buildings with fewer lots may suit the old fashioned security bars and newer buildings with more lots will need some type of less intrusive model but I am sure as this issue is discussed variations will evolve and eventually…solution.

Very prickly subject matter, but there you go.

Cheers CBF

I just would like to thank you Jimmy and also CBF. Some other critics on the forum put me down,but what you both said made a lot of sense to me.

“Safety must come first, but aesthetics cannot be ignored” is the lesson I have learned.

To succeed, I had to come up with a better product, less intrusive and easier to install.

At first I intended to develop something, but after some research I found something else, a new product, which unfortunately is not made in Australia, but it is completely transparent, made of a different material.

It is virtually invisible, so I believe it will have a much better chance to be accepted by Stratas. 12