Re: Timing of by law changes and unresolved disputes

Thanks so much.

Since the original post the EC has had a vote and all voted against. I am a member of the EC and was not notified of the meeting, or provided with minutes. (Apparently the contact person contacted the other unit holders via telephone). I have requested to have the topic added to the upcoming AGM and after the agenda was mailed out I had to remind them that they didn’t add this to the agenda (which they now have). If they vote against is this binding? I am of the impression that without providing a reasonable reason for denying me keeping my pet they would have to hold a special resolution to change the by laws. And is voting against seen as a reasonable reason? The AGM is this upcoming week and I am certain they will vote against and probably give reasons for their decision that are not reasonable. If this is the case I will go to mediation. Any thoughts/advise would be greatly appreciated. The specific agenda note is “that the owners corp RESOLVE (in caps and bold) to permit dogs to reside within the lots of the strata scheme”. Usually only 4 of the 6 owners attend the meeting so if they voted it would likely be 3:1, ie. 25%

Also my partner lives with me but is not an owner, can she attend the AGM (I am aware that she will not be able to speak at the meeting, but I would like her there for support). Can they deny her from attending?

Thanks again

Regardless should I still apply for mediation regarding the improper meeting and voting already conducted. I am being treated like a tenant in my own apartment.