After 4 years of using BuildingLink ($2 per lot/month), a separate committee discussion forum (free), a separate invoicing system (provided by SM) and more recently a separate voting site ($300 per year), an all-in-one package is appealing.
However, if our experience is anything to go by, the success of an all-in-one solution will depend on the ‘smarts’ of the users involved and not necessarily prove to be better than having a number of dedicated programs that can work together but independently if required. As ‘Happy strata’ stated garbage in, garbage out and often bears no relation to the ability of the software itself.
For example:
Strata Manager – in our case, will not use our management software so committee is constantly comparing two strata rolls. This is a time-wasting nuisance that we can see no way round this in the foreseeable future. We like our SM otherwise.
Committee members – management software offers a very good general forum but a mediocre committee forum (time restrictions for one).
Building Manager – maintenance and building-wide communications via management software are excellent.
Communication – SMS or email messages are wonderful – but can be over-used by over-enthusiastic residents. Our ‘marketplace’ was subjected to 25 posts by one resident in 5 minutes a couple of days ago – leading a number of other residents to ‘unsubscribe’.
Voting – we have had recent conversations with a voting service about linking to our management software – but that has gone into the too hard basket, A simple workaround exporting/importing the strata roll into a dedicated voting site worked a treat.
Document library – some users cannot spell! So documents can be archived all over the place.
We have also had the experience of losing data following a falling out with a single provider.
So, for what it is worth, when considering an all-in-one package caution should prevail.