- This topic is empty.
Bully Committee has started to obey 106 (1) fixing a failed membrane but is using a DIY approach, no flood testing. Technically it is obeying 232 (2) (a) in that it is “exercising a function” .
Having spent years failing to obey 106 (1) by pretending there was no membrane problem , they are now on a pathway to nowhere. We are applying to Fair Trading to get them to exercise a professional repair job.
Am worried they can stall forever because they are in the process of fixing it…how long can an SC be in the process of exercising a function? They are so devious this could go on forever., Can one go to the Tribunal considering this weakness in the Act? Plenty of evidence they are skilled obfuscators.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.