Flat Chat Strata Forum Strata Committees Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #7585
    Billen Ben
    Flatchatter

      This is a copy of an Executive Committee policy from a large SP.
      I would appreciate some feedback on the legitimacy of some of the practices in the policy.

      Executive Committee Policy

      1 The EC Chair will enforce the approved Code of Conduct at all EC meetings.

      2 The Executive Committee shall maintain correspondences between the Executive Committee, Unit holders and relevant bodies by written and electronic means as necessary.

      3 The Executive Committee shall maintain relevant email accounts for its office bearers being (for example) secretary@…… and treasurer@ ….

      4 The Secretary of the EC will prioritise responding to email correspondence from businesses or government bodies except where the Secretary officially delegates correspondence to be handled by another Executive Committee member. The Secretary of the EC will record all correspondences every month in the relevant EC Meeting Minutes.

      5 The Secretary of the EC may elect to respond to no more than one email correspondence (other than complaints) regarding one issue per eveny 3 months from an individual unit holders / residents. Due to Secretarial workloads individual unit holders at the discretion of the EC Secretary can expect to receive a response to no more than 4 emails per year. The Secretary of the EC must record the email as incoming and/or outgoing mail / email in respective EC Meeting Minutes.

      6 All complaints from unit holders/ residents must be made in writing and a hard copy posted to the EC for consideration and/or reply at an EC meeting. In regards to a written complaint, if the EC is unable to resolve the issue then the EC will defer the matter to the Peace Forum.

      7 Financial matters must be reviewed by the Executive Committee Treasurer before resolution.

      8 The Executive Committee shall actively monitor the functionality of all sub-committees and pursue the submission of monthly reports from all sub-committee co-ordinators.

      9 New ***** unit holders will be issued with a copy of the most recent EC Minutes, current AGM Minutes, ***** Handbook and a current Financial Statement for that Unit.

      10 The EC must allocate an adequate amount of time at EC meetings for the Treasurers Report to be discussed and understood in detail by all EC members.

      11 Should no quorum for a scheduled EC meeting be reached then the meeting shall be adjourned until 7 days after the date of the first scheduled meeting and all unit holders shall be notified by notice posted on the community notice board.

      12 Should an emergency EC meeting be required the Secretary must advertise on the OC notice board the date scheduled for the EC meeting 72 hours prior to that meeting.

      13 Should an EC member not attend more than 3 scheduled EC meetings then that EC position will be advertised as available on notice boards and in respective EC minutes.

    Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #14164

      Hi, I know the chairman of the EC has no right to vote in the ECM, what if (s)he is the secretary as well, then can (s)he vote?         Thanks

      #14168
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        You're a bit off the mark, there.

        The chair has every right to vote  at an Executive Committee meeting – they just don't have a casting vote if there is a tie. 

        EC votes are strictly one EC member, one vote – there is no poll voting based on unit entitlements or use of proxies from non-EC members or extra votes based on being an office bearer.

        The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
        #14191
        Gilgal1
        Flatchatter

          Billen Ben said:

          5 The Secretary of the EC may elect to respond to no more than one email correspondence (other than complaints) regarding one issue per eveny 3 months from an individual unit holders / residents. Due to Secretarial workloads individual unit holders at the discretion of the EC Secretary can expect to receive a response to no more than 4 emails per year. The Secretary of the EC must record the email as incoming and/or outgoing mail / email in respective EC Meeting Minutes.

          Many of the items in this list look familiar to people working in organisations which hold a lot of meetings.

          However I’m astonished that anyone would choose to ration emails and the number of issues people can raise in any given period! Delayed responses are understandable if you’re a really busy volunteer…. To be honest, it looks to me like there must be some history of conflict for someone to draft such a bizarre limit to participation.

          I don’t know about your owners’ corporation, but ours contracts a strata manager to deal with day to day inquiries about maintenance. If the issue is big, or involves funds over a certain limit, then the strata manager must consult our eC.

          Our EC focusses on trying to set priorities and policy. We encourage any unit owner who wants to attend our EC meetings to do so. And we try to foster a friendly environment – something this clause 5 looks like it could undermine.

          #14195
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster

            Billen Ben said:

            I would appreciate some feedback on the legitimacy of some of the practices in the policy.

            13 Should an EC member not attend more than 3 scheduled EC meetings then that EC position will be advertised as available on notice boards and in respective EC minutes.

            There is a very specific method required to remove EC members and it involves a special resolution at a General Meeting.  This is what it says in the Act:

            A determination by an owners corporation that a person’s office as member of the executive committee is vacated requires a special resolution which is defined as a resolution which is passed at a duly convened general meeting of an owners corporation and against which not more than one-quarter in value, ascertained in accordance with clause 18 (2) and (3) of Part 2 of Schedule 2, of votes is cast.

            The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
            #14196
            Billen Ben
            Flatchatter
            Chat-starter

              I would like to say thanks to those who have passed comment on the “EC policy.”

              To Gilgal1 i would say it is indeed astonishing that the EC would ration replies. This clause of the policy is to “empower” the Secretary to ignore certain people and certain issues. The beautiful part is that the Secretary receives a $1500 honourarium for ignoring certain people and certain issues.

              To Jimmy i would say well picked up. An EC member cannot just be shown the door because they miss a few meetings. This clause of the policy was included to target specific EC members who sometime do not come to meetings because they feel bullied and powerless in the face of the dominant element in the EC. The interesting part of this clause is that when an EC member did miss 3 meeting there was no talk of invoking the policy because of which EC member it was who failed to attend the 3 meetings.

              I would say that if an OC is passing this type of policy at an AGM then all is not well ….. and that is indeed the case.

              I will  mention the policy was passed by a large OC and so the clauses relating to meeting notifications (11 and 12) leave a lot to be desired.

              It has proven impossible to bring about change in the SP which has this policy. Owners are either a part of implementing such a policy or they do not participate in the AGMs. CTTT have virtually endorsed everything going on in the SP in question. The AGM has flatly refused to engage management.

              People are heading for the exit turnstile and i feel there should be a better option than selling when owners are faced with unreasonable rabbles running SPs …. regrettably there isn't.

            Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

            Flat Chat Strata Forum Strata Committees Current Page