Flat Chat Strata Forum The Professionals Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #9243
    Mailbox
    Flatchatter

      I am an owner of a townhouse in a block of two which was under self management but became strata managed to resolve a common boundary fence issue. The SM resolved this problem thro legal action and I was hoping to return to self management but this wasn’t possible. Due to an altercation with the owners of the other townhouse and insufficient levies the SM received a successful full management order from a tribunal hearing resulting in special levies and a high increase in strata levies. The strata quarterly levy has increased from $400 to $850 and due to the tribunal hearing neither owner is able to attend the AGM or complain about the high increase. As my townhouse is only valued at approx. $300,000 & I am on the disability pension is there any course of action that would be worthwhile. Also removing strata management appears hopeless when the other owners will not agree to it.

       

      Many thanks for any help.

    Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #20344
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        This is a very good example of how a statutorily appointed manager can be a double edged sword.  While owners corps can, to some extent, pay fast and loose with their responsibilities, Strata Managers have a legal responsibility to do the right thing and therefore tend to err on the side of over-servicing rather than under-servicing.  And remember, things haven’t been done properly or they wouldn’t be there so they know that there is a level of scrutiny.

        Your best if not only hope is for you and your neighbours to present a united front at the CTTT.  If you can’t do that, the CTTT would be very unlikely to remove the order since the fundamental  problem clearly still exists. 

        The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
        #20345
        Kangaroo
        Flatchatter

          @JimmyT said:
          Your best if not only hope is for you and your neighbours to present a united front at the CTTT.

          There are some things about this story which are not clear and I suspect that the problem may be that meganpepi and the neighbours cannot present a united front.

          1) Who had the altercation with the neighbours, you or the SM?

          2) Is the boundary fence between your lot and your neighbour’s lot, or is it between your scheme and another neighbour?

          3) Who applied to the CTTT to have a statutory SM appointed, you, your neighbours or the SM?

          @meganpepi said:
          Also removing strata management appears hopeless when the other owners will not agree to it.

          Sounds like the neighbour is happy with the SM.

          #20349
          Mailbox
          Flatchatter
          Chat-starter

            @Kangaroo said:

            @JimmyT said:
            Your best if not only hope is for you and your neighbours to present a united front at the CTTT.

            There are some things about this story which are not clear and I suspect that the problem may be that meganpepi and the neighbours cannot present a united front.

            1) Who had the altercation with the neighbours, you or the SM?

            MeganPepi said

            I had the altercation with the neighbours with not agreeing to replace a gate they deliberately sabotaged. I had a feeling they would do this and have before & after photos of the gate. Since this incident approval my way has not been forthcoming & so on.T

            2) Is the boundary fence between your lot and your neighbour’s lot, or is it between your scheme and another neighbour?
            MeganPepi said

            The boundary fence issue has been resolved and was with another neighbour.

            3) Who applied to the CTTT to have a statutory SM appointed, you, your neighbours or the SM?

            MeganPepi said

            The SM applied to the CTTT on behalf of the neighbours.

            @meganpepi said:
            Also removing strata management appears hopeless when the other owners will not agree to it.

            Sounds like the neighbour is happy with the SM.

             

            #20358
            scotlandx
            Strataguru

              meganpepi – if you have had a full management order from the Tribunal then there must have been some serious issues with the management/administration of your plan.  This is not the type of order that is given lightly, and the Tribunal needs to be satisfied that essentially the plan/scheme is not functioning, especially if full orders are made, which means that all power was taken away from the owners.

              If there were insufficient levies then that also had to be rectified.  In the general scheme of things $1700 a quarter in total is not a huge amount of money, although of course if the scheme were self-managed then you wouldn’t be paying a strata manager.  We don’t know what other issues there were or are that require the increase in levies.

              It also seems from what you have said that the other owner instigated the application for an order for a compulsory strata manager.  They must have, as no-one else has standing to request such an order (well ok they might, but it would be unusual).

              I think you are correct – at present you will not be able to remove the strata manager.  You don’t say how long their appointment is for, but you will need to wait at least until that lapses.

              #20383
              Mailbox
              Flatchatter
              Chat-starter

                Hi Scotlandx – The full time SM order is only for a year and hopefully it will not be extended. It’s a dreadful feeling not having a say in the very townhouse you own. I don’t know what to expect next and it’s not unusual to arrive home and find some palm trees have been removed or my courtyard has been accessed with plumbers fixing the toilet. I prefer to be around when tradesmen are attending to something but this isn’t the case. I’m then left with other problems as a result of the tradesmen. While the problem exists with all owners not on speaking terms I cannot see a solution apart from maybe selling the townhouse.

              Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

              Flat Chat Strata Forum The Professionals Current Page