• This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by .
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #9917

    Have a lot owner demolish common property, refuse the Owners Corporation direction to reinstate, follow legal advice not to communicate with the other owners and then seek the appointment of a compulsory manager because the strata is dysfunctional.

    The Owners Corporation has maintained common property, has regular meetings, defers decisions unless all 3 owners are present, maintains insurance and keeps very comprehensive accounts.  But it has been held dysfunctional because the one dissident owner has made it so.

    NCAT doesn’t follow the law.  Seiwa is wrong, Lesley_Swan is wrong, bylaws don’t count and NCAT sys this is how the law operates.

    Hint: when you get to NCAT, lawyer up.  Don’t believe the lies that this is a low cost, non-lawyer tribunal.

    The adjudicator required the compulsorily appointed agent to get a report for the Owners Corporation but then let the dissident owner and his builder brief the engineer the manager engaged.  Did I mention that the dissident owner has given a testimonial to the builder on its website and that the engineer does work for the dissident owner’s employer, as does the builder.  Conflicts of interest: of no concern to NCAT.

    The NCAT adjudicator simply disregards evidence submitted not by a lawyer, such as when we destroyed the common property, we were acting for the dissident owner. 

    We are outside the 21 day appeal time for the adjudicator’s orders.  Ah, that piece of law is one that NCAT holds most dear.  Even though we were wrong, you are stuck with it.

    The compulsory manager now wants to charge a levy that includes a $39K contingency fee plus another $14.5K unexplained.  She’s a compulsory appointment and cannot be questioned.

    Any suggestions for remedies?  I’m getting desperate.  They want $124K to fix the damage caused by the dissident owner, all billed to the Owners Corporation.

    NCAT proves just how much of an ass the law can be!

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #23127
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      You need to talk to an experienced and effective strata lawyer now.  But remember, it will be your own money as the EC no longer exists.

      The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
      #23130

      Does such an animal exist?  The leading text book uthor promises a letter but doesn’t send it, the leading female acts for the dissident owner, writes our case for us (she forgot who’s side she was on) and then is sacked, the other leading firm says it is no point appealing the adjudicator’s orders because it’s just confirming the mediation settlement even though the reasons are full of errors, one of the leading practitioners mentioned on your website took a brief, promised drafts on at least 5 occasions nd in late January said he was too busy: a wasted 3 months.  The firm he recommended says you are out of time to appeal, give up.

      The OC decided to not pay the builder the final $2k from his first job because of damage he had caused and his destruction of common property.  The medaition agreed to do the work the builder specified but did not require that builder to be used.  The adjudicator’s order specifies that that is the work to be done.

      The compulsorily appointed strata manager is determined to use that builder.  She has paid the outstanding amount and the builder knows he is in.  His quote for the work went up by a factor of 5.  The mediation required 3 quotes.  The agent says she must use that builder, even though this is not in the order.

      Who advised the agent on how to allocate the costs?  The builder and the consulting engineer.  The dissident owner works for a major developer.  The builder works for that developer.  Indeed, the owner gives a testimonial for the builder for his work for the developer.  Gues which consulting engineer works for the developer?

      I have a compulsorily appointed strata manager who refuses to answer questions and who favours the dissident owner.  And NCAT says, yes, that’s how the law works.

      #23138
      sealion
      Flatchatter

        On 1 January 2013 a new Regulation commenced in NSW requiring licensees engaged in qualifying activities under the Property Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 (NSW) (PSBAA), including strata managers, to hold professional indemnity (PI) insurance.

        Maybe you can consider an indemnity claim? CHU has an excellent fact sheet on the new Regulation at:

        https://www.chu.com.au/strata-news/2013/03/the-new-mandatory-professional-indemnity-regulation

        #23139
        scotlandx
        Strataguru

          You need to have a basis to claim, and that would involve taking legal action against the strata manager.

        Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.