Flat Chat Strata Forum Common Property Current Page

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by .
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #8059
    Cosmo
    Flatchatter

      II live in a block of 4 units and our strata plan has been in existence sine 1978. Our OC recently had our strata valued and the valuation was $2.1 million. Our insurance is due and the value insured is for $2.6 million.

      There appears no discrepency between what is valued and what is insured. Nor is there anything in the insurance policy that indicates any reason we should be insured for more than the valuation. There are the usual clauses in both the valuation and the insurance regarding improvements and allowane for removal of debris etc. There is not anything in our records that would indicate why the Strata is insured for more than it is valued.

      The strata legislation requiring both valuations and insurance only says that the OC needs to insure the Strata for at least the valuation. It would appear just on the figures that our strata is over insuring by over 20%. I could understand and accept if the it was say around 10% or less but the over insurance seems quite a lot.

      I remember years ago a friend of mine telling me over insurance was as bad as under insurance. Should our OC insure for the valuation or the amount nominated by our insurance company? What are the risks of doing either?

      Thanks in advance

    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #15297
      struggler
      Flatchatter

        It reall would depend on what exactly your policy covers you for. For instance, does it cover landscaping?
        When it comes to building, the price of a new home rarely reflects the actual cost. When you go to those display homes centres, the cost of building the new home often does not cover the exterior landscaping, driveways or even some of the features found on the inside. So if your insurance policy is for the rebuild of the actual structure only, then yes it would cost more to “complete” your complex to original should the unthinkable happen and the building was damaged to the extent you would need a rebuild.
        The $500,000 more that your building is covered for is $125,000 per unit. It sometimes pays to look at extra costs by dividing by the number of units and see whether that cost is justified in that way. Check out your policy first and see what is covered.

        #15298
        Cosmo
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          @struggler said:

          It reall would depend on what exactly your policy covers you for. For instance, does it cover landscaping?
          When it comes to building, the price of a new home rarely reflects the actual cost. When you go to those display homes centres, the cost of building the new home often does not cover the exterior landscaping, driveways or even some of the features found on the inside. So if your insurance policy is for the rebuild of the actual structure only, then yes it would cost more to “complete” your complex to original should the unthinkable happen and the building was damaged to the extent you would need a rebuild.
          The $500,000 more that your building is covered for is $125,000 per unit. It sometimes pays to look at extra costs by dividing by the number of units and see whether that cost is justified in that way. Check out your policy first and see what is covered.

          Hi Struggler, As I said I have looked through the policy and the valuation, it appears that the valuation covers all that is needed. And my question was based on that.

          Maybe in asking this question I am showing my extreme cyncism towards insurance companys but I just want to make sure that our OC is not caught out on a technicality or paying too high of a premium!

          I accept that the specifics of any claim will depend upon the actual wording of the contract and you never usually exactly find out until you make a claim. But if we accept that it is a pretty standard contract are there any inherent risks associated with ‘over insuring’?

          What I was after was a view on what are the risks associated with ‘over insuring’. For example, lets say as you point out ‘the worse happens’ or close to the worst say a claim for $1 milion dollars. Would the insurance company be entitled to scale back any payout because we were ‘over insuring’. I have been told companys do this for ‘under insuring’ eg saying you only insured for 75% of what you should have so we are only going to pay you 75% of any substantiated claim.

          On the other hand if the insurance company is not entitled to adjust any claim the OC may be paying a higher premium than they have to. Which is just a waste of money.

          Thanks

          #15299
          struggler
          Flatchatter

            Though not an expert by any means on insurance, I would think the big problem with over insuring would be the higher premiums you pay along the way. So in the unlikely event of a rebuild, you are insured for $1.5M but only need $1M perhaps you could have to look at how much money you have paid over the years for that extra $500,000.
            As your insurance should be reviewed each year, you can always adjust it to cover a bit more each AGM to reflect the increase in value of your property and the projected increases of building materials, labour etc should the unthinkable happen.

          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

          Flat Chat Strata Forum Common Property Current Page