• Creator
    Topic
  • #9341
    Millie
    Flatchatter

      When one lodges a response to a NCAT/CTTT Submission is it OK to fill it full of porkies or, as in a court case, would this be considered purjury?

      What happens if one does this – is there any comeback/blowback?

      Just wondering….

    Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #20862
      Whale
      Flatchatter

        I seem to remember you stating in another post that the complainants’ submission in your matter had contained some “porkies”, and if that’s the case your best (if not only) response would be to provide statements, ideally evidentiary, to rebut those – not to proliferate them.

        Remember though you’re not dealing with a Court, and that change of acronym or otherwise, you’re still dealing with the CTTT, where the Legislative Council’s inquiry found their procedures “complex and bewildering” and where the strangest decisions too often emerged!

        #20864
        Millie
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thanks Whale. The other way around. Evidence was presented and it was the respondents who replied with false statements.

        Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.