• Creator
    Topic
  • #9557
    Newbie
    Flatchatter

      Our strata’s Notice of AGM has just been served on owners.  It has many mistakes.

      The notice includes incorrect financial statements that claim to report a full year but only report on part of the year. 

      We changed SM part way through the year and the new SM has left out the activity of the old SM.

      To remedy, an Income & Expenditure statement from the missing period has been issued by the SM to add to the Notice but the financial statements haven’t been changed to include these figures.

      Is this OK?

      Three motions adding to common property are on the agenda as ordinary resolutions.  After an owner protested the SM served an amended Notice describing the motions as special resolutions.

      Can an agenda be amended?

      With thanks

    Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #21780
      Whale
      Flatchatter

        The NSW Strata Schemes Management Act (Schedule 2) requires that the Agenda of General Meetings is provided to Owners a minimum 7 days before that Meeting is convened, and that’s primarily intended to ensure that everyone has adequate time to digest the content, to form their queries if any, and all so that they’re in a position to cast informed votes on all Motions.

        In your case, there a few anomalies that will make it even more difficult for Owners to decipher the financial and other information that’s been provided as addenda to the original Agenda in advance of the Meeting, and that’s the important thing to take into account in deciding if everything is “OK”.

        So if the most recent addendum to the Agenda was received by all Owners a minimum 7 days before the Meeting date and Owners can decipher everything or at least know what clarifications to seek on the day, then in my opinion that’s “OK”, and if otherwise, the Strata Manager should be if possible provided with a list of clarifications and be instructed to defer the Meeting to a date that at least complies with that prescribed 7 day window.

        #21781
        Newbie
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thank you, the addenda was emailed on the seventh day before the AGM. Not all owners have email, some rely on posted communication.

          The mistakes I described are only two of many. raising my concern as to how an AGM can work with so many amendments required on the floor of the meeting.  Already there is a stream of chaotic emails with differing suggestions on how to fix the mistakes.  Some have suggested entirely new motions to replace the problematic ones.

          Just how much change can be made to the original notice?  The SSMA is not helpful here unless I’ve missed it.

          #21782
          Whale
          Flatchatter

            The plot thickens!

            AGM’s need to be held within one month either side of the date that the Plan’s first ever such Meeting was held, so yours probably has some leeway in terms of its date.

            Notwithstanding any delegations to your Strata Manager, it’s your Executive Committee Secretary who has the ultimate authority to convene General Meetings, so in the circumstances where there are numerous addenda and it’s likely that some Owners without email would not have received the most recent of those within the prescribed timeframe, it’s entirely appropriate for the Secretary to advise your Strata Manager that the AGM is postponed until such time as a consolidated and properly formed Agenda is available for re-issue.

            I can’t help wondering how your new Strata Manager is so unaware of the requirements of Sch. 2 of the SCMA!

            #22504
            Newbie
            Flatchatter
            Chat-starter

              The latest…

              The financials were not adopted at our AGM.  The meeting voted to defer to an EGM where corrected financials be presented.  

              I am now in receipt of the Notice of EGM – the financials presented with the notice are more dire than those presented at the AGM.

              The EC has engaged an owner to assist it with the corrections – an enthusiastic amateur who has just compounded existing errors and introduced new problems.

              No professional strata accounting advice was sought by the EC to sort out the mess the strata manager had made of the books.  In addition to discrepancies in the financials that point to an erosion of owners equity the ‘help’ has over claimed GST in corrections.

              This has all been pointed out to the EC by owners but the EC is now referring any questions about the material included in the Notice of EGM supporting that the financials are as “good as they can get” to the strata manager. 

              It has become a blame shifting game.

              I hold that it is the EC that is resonsible for the accounting of our money. Y/N?

              Can they deflect that responsibility to the SM?

              In any event, what do we do now?

              #22524
              Whale
              Flatchatter

                One of the main reasons for engaging the services of a Strata Manager (S/M) is so they’ll take care of the “financials”, and whilst it would be unusual in the extreme for that function not to be delegated to the S/M, perhaps check with them or take a look at the Agency Agreement that they hold with your Owners Corporation.

                As for what to do, I guess it depends upon what’s wrong with the financial statements, where provided there’s no evidence of fraud and the closing balances are not too far away from what’s in the bank, perhaps “as good as they can get” is good enough provided the new S/M gets their head around things from now on and the Executive Committee keeps their collective fingers out of the detail!

              Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.