- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 4 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
I complained to the strata manager about the wording of the EGM. In requesting an EGM calling for motions in favour of certain bylaws, an executive member wrote that the CTTT ordered one of the bylaws. It didn’t. The adjudication ‘recommended’ a bylaw. On reading the text of the Notice of EGM, any prospective buyers will get the wrong impression. The strata manager replied to my complaint that any executive member can request an EGM with any wording they like. Comments?
In fact, the strata manager quoted the Act and said that he had to put the agenda wording exactly as the other exec member had put it to him. I have been advised separately that I should have added a motion to the agenda regarding the incorrect wording as soon as I saw it, because now, it stands and there isn’t any time to do anything about it.
As to the motives behind the incorrect wording that may dissuade prospective buyers – about the CTTT ordering the bylaw….the EGM is scheduled just days prior to the auction of our apartment. It’s puzzling why the other owner has chosen to try to dissuade prospective buyers and negatively influence the value of our apartment in this vain attempt to rush through amateurishly and poorly constructed bylaws, one of which has been seriously challenged by many prospective buyers. I can only guess that rather than being happy to see us go, he’d have us suffer as well as see us go.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.