- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 5 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
We own a townhouse in NSW with a courtyard and decided to replace some pavers. We did not get approval as thought that would only apply if we were adding a pegola or awning. Half way during the works we were ordered to stop by strata committee. We did immediately and lodged the relevant forms. We have been rejected by the community scheme who say the colour pavers we chose are not keeping with the aesthetics of the complex. The pavers are grey and match the door frames and the form filled out did say grey pavers to be used. Our courtyard is surrounded by hedges and can only be seen if close to our gate. The bylaws do not mention specific materials just with keeping with the look of the complex. We feel their objection is subjective on aesthetics and unreasonable. What options do we have to repeal this as pavers are down but not cemented. Any help appreciated. Also pavers originally down along with neighbouring townhouses are a mismatch of greys.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.