› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Smoke gets in your eyes › Current Page
- This topic has 21 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by .
-
CreatorTopic
-
22/01/2011 at 12:57 pm #7201
There’s a story bouncing around at the moment about a guy on the North Shore, a cancer victim who may be forced to sell his unit because residents in apartments below him are heavy smokers who insist on their “right” to blow their toxic fumes into his home.
According to the story, passed on by Flat Chat reader Rachel, this gentleman was diagnosed with cancer last September and is stuck at home. His problem comes from a “massive chain-smoker” who smokes constantly on his balcony below.
But his strata manager has told him the by-laws covering his unit block would not be changed to ban smoking on balconies. However, if my reading of the Strata Act is right, the poor sod doesn’t need a by-law; there’s a state law that already protects his right to breathe fresh air.
Section 117 of the Strata Schemes Management Act says owners and occupiers may not “cause a nuisance or hazard to the occupier of any other lot.” The same section says residents may not “interfere unreasonably with the use or enjoyment of any other lot by the occupier of the lot.”
Can smoking on balconies be a nuisance or a hazard? The Government thinks so, with bans on smoking on beaches and at sports venues as well as cafes, restaurants and bars. And that’s before you even get into lit cigarette ends being dropped on to neighbours’ property.
Can you stop people smoking on their own property? According to a ruling on this a couple of years ago, you can even stop them smoking INSIDE their homes if it causes a problem for other residents.
Sadly this guy has neither the time nor energy to fight this in the courts. Surely there’s a strata lawyer out there who will take on this battle pro bono … and maybe create a legal precedent that stops balcony smokers polluting everyone’s homes except their own.
JimmyT will be answering your questions live on James Valentine’s radio show on ABC 702 on Tuesday 25th.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
23/01/2011 at 2:11 am #12361Anonymous
One thing the cancer patient could do is shut his window. This may assist with keeping out the cigarette smoke, the toxic and lethal exhaust fumes from cars, trucks motor bikes and 4 whell drives etc. Other nasties would be in the shampoo he uses, his toothpaste and shower gel. etc etc. I have no idea what he might be eating but maybe he is also ingesting toxic chemicals from the crap put into on onto our produce. Not to mention the toxins and free radicals he is absorbing through his skin when he takes a walk somewhere in his vicinity.
I suppose we are led to believe through the propaganda that it's just cigarette smoke that causes all our health problems. But nobody seems to give a thought to the atomic bombs that have been set off by the thousands and are in our environment floating about and landing in all sorts of places and take 50,000 years to become harmeless.
Not many seem to put two and two together and realise that approximatley only 1%- 2% of people smoke cigarettes in Australia these days yet the cancer figures are on the increase with approximatley 3 in 8 people (Possibly more) contracting this dreadful thing. And in China approximately 75% of the population smoke cigarettes yet their cancer numbers are less than ours. (Per ratio) Go figure!
So our balcony man may shut his window or even get a court order to stop his neighbour smoking on his own balcony, but this will not solve the problem. Will it!?
23/01/2011 at 12:44 pm #12363I don't dispute your general assertion that we live in a toxic world but I think you'll find 17-20 percent of Australians smoke. And by telling this person to close their window you are denying them the right to breathe air that would be a bit less toxic if the person below him wasn't chain-smoking.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
23/01/2011 at 7:52 pm #12367AnonymousI just wanted to add that does this massive chain-smoker, who supposedly smokes constantly on his balcony below is even aware of the unfortunate situation of the gentleman that is living above him?
Although it is very unfortunate to be diagnosed with cancer, wouldn't the effort of trying to communicate with this massive chain smoker be better served than kicking up a fuss about how to stop this individual from smoking on his own property?
If the smoker below doesn't even know about this unfortunate chain of events offcourse he would think that it is ok to smoke on his balcony. Seems like the story portrayed could be a bit biased and one sided. I mean how do you know when the smoker downstairs is smoking inside their apartment. In my view, just complaining about it is not going to get the problem solved for you.
Just trying to help give some insights from what I've read, about the other party(smoker downstairs), which seems to have been left out of the article that has been published.
24/01/2011 at 7:11 am #12369AnonymousKitty Boyes said:
One thing the cancer patient could do is shut his window. This may assist with keeping out the cigarette smoke, the toxic and lethal exhaust fumes …
Kitty Boyle.. representative of which tobacco company??
Your post is laughable. In our block we currently have a young woman who sits on her balcony with her friends smoking away into the early hours most days. The smoke travels into all the neighbouring units and STINKS. It is rude, inconsiderate, offensive and a health hazzard. For starters you end up shallow breathing all night and wake up tired and un-rested.
Closing windows?? That's a great idea on a summer night Kitty Boyle, that way we can have NO breeze come in to cool the unit down. And yes, we did try that before sweating ourselves to sleep.
This is a health issue and it's a basic respect, courtesy and consideration issue. I'd love to blast my music loudly and have parties etc but I don't because I respect my neighbours, it's that simple.
Lets just hope strata can do something about it because polite requests and the Police have had no lasting effect.
What you are saying about toxins in general is missing a large part of the point Kitty Boyle. Cigarette smoke is dirty and disgusting and stinks. I don't imagine lying in a bedroom or sitting in a lounge room filled with passive smoke would be good for anyones health either..
24/01/2011 at 7:24 am #12370ct031 said:
I just wanted to add that does this massive chain-smoker, who supposedly smokes constantly on his balcony below is even aware of the unfortunate situation of the gentleman that is living above him? … Just trying to help give some insights from what I've read, about the other party(smoker downstairs), which seems to have been left out of the article that has been published.
The original article says this:
In November, another smoker moved into another unit on the floor underneath theirs and when Ms Kuhn explained her husband’s condition to the neighbour and asked him to limit his smoking she was met with abuse, she said.
By the way, there's a very high probability that the balcony isn't his property – it may well be common property under the strata plan. Also he's not exactly smoking on his property if the smoke is going into other people's homes.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
24/01/2011 at 8:41 am #12374AnonymousThis is what smokers need:
https://hilobrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/cone-of-silence-1.jpg
24/01/2011 at 9:32 am #12375AnonymousMy observation is most (not all but most) smokers are inconsiderate, insensitive, thick-skinned and thoughtless. Thoughtless? Why would you choose to deliberately, purposefully inhale tobacco smoke? And why would you sit outside doing that to the inside of your body, while making the effort to preserve the smell and decor of your flat?
24/01/2011 at 10:46 am #12376AnonymousIf it is not against a bylaw then it is not against a bylaw.
If smoking is not against the law then it is not against the law.
I thought medium to high density living was about compromise. This works both ways. Not just for one group with their own particular position. I have sympathy for the guy, but for the larger issue whilst smoking is still legal then it is a fact of apartment living that some people might smoke. It could be worse. They could listen to Rhianna.
I don’t smoke, but friends do. So maybe one night a month max there may be a smoker on the balcony who has 3 over the night, so hardly chain smoking. So the next door neighbour makes a fuss. He, of course BBQ’s on his balcony every single night. So what. I shut the door when he is cooking. It’s not a drama. I understand that he enjoys cooking on a BBQ, but how about some understanding from his end?
The guy in the unit below me smokes at night. Maybe 4 or 5 from 5-11 at night, so hardly unreasonable. He’s a good guy apart from that so I say live and let live. There needs to be an expectation of some level of disruption to our ideal life when living in close proximity. Either live with it, move out, or spend all your efforts whingeing, moaning and getting worked up over trivial matters.
Oh, and if you have an issue with what people are doing. Just speak to them. It’s amazing what that can achieve. Don’t act like a child, slamming doors, running off to the Strata Manager or throwing things at people.
24/01/2011 at 1:00 pm #12377Drew said:
If it is not against a bylaw then it is not against a bylaw.
If smoking is not against the law then it is not against the law.
I agree with 95 percent of what you say but there are always circumstances that differ – exceptions that prove the rule, if you like.
The law is the law, as you say but the law is never as simple as it seems. For instance, if you live in strata and you have permission to have a pet under the terms of the by-laws, you are not breaking a by-law if you have one . But if that pet causes a health problem for another resident then you could be ordered to remove it even though it is there legally:
151 Order relating to animal kept in accordance with
by-laws
(1) An Adjudicator may make one of the following orders if the
Adjudicator considers that an animal kept on a lot or the common property in
accordance with the by-laws causes a nuisance or hazard to the owner or an
occupier of another lot or unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment
of another lot or of the common property:
(a) an order that the person keeping the animal cause the animal to be
removed from the parcel within a specified time, and to be kept away from the
parcel,
(b) an order that the person keeping the animal take, within a time
specified in the order, such action so specified as, in the opinion of the
Adjudicator, will terminate the nuisance, hazard or unreasonable
interference.
We're talking about a guy who has cancer and has been confined to his home. There aren't a lot of options open to him and a little human decency from his neighbours (for what we can assume will be a limited time) wouldn't go amiss.
Also the question of whether or not a by-law is in place neatly skips the issue of whther or not one SHOULD be in place. The building I live in doesn't allow air-conditioning because it is 'environmentally friendly' and designed to be cooled by having airflow through open windows. The original chairman was a caveman who only knew how to cook on fire so he blocked any attempts to interpret the by-laws in any way that suggested they didn't allow barbecues (they don't allow smoke on common property). He would barbecue meat, fish and seafood five nights a week – after first burning off the fat from the previous cook-out. After he'd been sacked as chairman he even managed to smoke out the room in the next-door apartment where a meeting was being held to discuss the issue of barbecues (TRUE!!). But because of his lead, gradually more and more barbecues appeared until about a quarter of the balconies in this building have them. That means the by-law that should, logically, have been in place from day one – if you HAVE to keep your windows open in summer to stay cool you should have some protection from smoke and fumes – will never be enacted. By the way, there are plenty of buildings in Sydney that do have air conditioning but don't allow barbecues.
The problem isn't even the majority of barbecue owners. I'd say out of all the barbecues that there are my building, most get used once a month in Summer, if that. But allowing them to operate means that there are a couple of barbecue maniacs who cook almost every night, never clean their barbecues and can stink out 20 or 30 apartments with smoke and smell in one go (I wonder if there's a connection between cooking and eating the cheapest meat and sausages and having no regard for your neighbours).
Your admirable tolerance and give and take would be tested by coming home after an eveing out to find the stink of prawns and chorizo clinging to your walls becasue you'd been foolish enough to leave your window open to keep the place cool.
The telling point for me is the one thing that balcony smokers and barbecue cooks have in common – they close their doors so the smoke and smell doesn't get in to their flats (usually because of pressure from their partners). So it's not that there's no problem – it that they want to make sure that problem is not theirs. And by the way, anyone who says banning barbecues will reduce rents is just clutching at straws. We own a rental property and just to be consistent, insist that our tenants can't have barbecues. We have never had any trouble letting it and one guy who didn't read the small print just shrugged his shoulders and dumped the barbie. Live and let live – I agree – but it's time Sydneysiders grew up and accepted that give and take might mean giving up barbecues when they get all the other benefits of living in apartments.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
24/01/2011 at 1:33 pm #12378ConeOfSilence said:
This is what smokers need:
https://hilobrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/cone-of-silence-1.jpg
Yes, but will the Executive Committee pay for it out of the Stinking Fund. Hurr-hurr!
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
25/01/2011 at 10:30 am #12379AnonymousI agree with the isolated incident in question – hell, I’m sure most reasonable people, when confronted with that situation, would either smoke indoors or leave the property. But, we don’t have access to the other side of the story in this instance. And unlike most people I am not going to jump on the evil smokers are scum and are morally reprehensible bandwagon, which seems to becoming more prevalent (coming at this from a libertarian, non-smoking position). I’d like to hear what the full story is – within the local paper, which I receive, someone who lived in the same unit block made the comment that there is a lot more to this story. I reserve judgement on the matter until I hear this.
But I think that there is a wider issue, which is what I alluded to, and that is the increasing over regulation of life in general. I don’t care if they guy next door bbq’s a lot of the time. That is his life. I do not think it appropriate for people to attack those who are carrying out legal activities, or even illegal activities that do not cause harm (in a legal sense), in their own dwelling. What next? Unmarried couples being refused entry to a unit block for the sake of “family values”?
I grew up in 500ha of land, then moved to 10ha of land, then a suburban block, then an apartment in the inner city. I’ve gone from having no neighbours within 10kms to having neighbours on all sides. But you know what, minor inconveniences are really not that much of a drama. So what if the guy in the unit above me has his friends over on a Friday night and they listen to music until midnight most weekends. So what if the guy below me smokes. So what if the guy next door bbq’s. That is all how they want to live their life and I am not going to interfere for the sake of my own preconceived notions on how life should and shouldn’t be lived. Yeah, sometimes smoke blows in from the BBQ and from the neighbour’s cigs, but leave the door open and 5 minutes later all the smell is gone. Hardly the end of the world. No worse than cooking some fish in the apartment (I suppose that next we will be told that this has a negative impact on other peopl I’m sure some of the things I do might annoy my neighbours. I know that my car has a loud exhaust pipe for instance, but it hardly gets driven, except during the day on weekends, oh, and the afore-mentioned friend who smokes on my balcony once a month or so. But if you want peace and quiet and no intrusion from other people then perhaps unit living in a large city isn’t for you.
25/01/2011 at 12:31 pm #12383There is a happy medium and strata living does require a certain amount of give and take and if everybody is on board with that, then it has so many advantages that I reckon it's the only way to live in the city.
However, as in every other aspect of life, there are people who think 'give and take' means you give and they take.
There's a building in the city that was taken to the CTTT by a children's pre-school situated at its base, where staff would come in every morning to find the place littered with food scraps, beer cans, broken bottles and cigarette ends. The cigarette ends also burned holes in the their sun shades and on a couple of occasions badly damaged their equipment.
Their complaints were valid and this wasn't just one person nor even the residents of one apartment. There was a culture of unfetterred yahooism in the building and nobody was interested in doing anything about it.
Yes, let's give each other a bit of leeway but, hey, isn't it time we all grew the f… up and stopped behaving like the cast of The Young Ones (showing my age).
In the 22 years I have lived in Sydney, 21 of them have been in apartment blocks in and around Kings Cross. I reckon I've seen the best and the worst and being asked to follow a few rules related to basic human decency isn't the toughest thing that will happen to you in your life.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
25/01/2011 at 12:55 pm #12384AnonymousDear Bloggers and Owner Affected
I would be happy to assist this person on a pro bono basis.
There are a number of options, such as:
- make a section 47 by-law to probihit smoking in the lot and common property; and
- make an application for mediation in the Office of Trading; and
- if mediation is unsuccessful make an application for adjudicators orders in the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal seeking an order restraining smoking on balconies under section 138 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 for breach of secttion 117 of the Act.
Regards
David Bannerman
Bannermans Lawyers
(02) 9929 0226
25/01/2011 at 2:15 pm #12385AnonymousI agree – if something is in a by-law then by all means it should be complied with. And if it causes serious issues with other occupants (more than just the “I don’t like that” level) then it should be addressed as such.
But, if it is something that someone else finds annoying that another unit occupant does, then it can generally be solved by talking to them. Most people are generally pretty reasonable and may not realise what they are doing is causing an issue. I’m a firm believer in the sit down and talk like grown ups about it. Don’t like smoking next door, go and have a chat with them, come to an arrangement. Even evil smokers are generally (with the odd exception, same as anyone) pretty reasonable. Some may be renters, in which case they generally can’t smoke inside. I know that the property manager I use has that as a standard clause.
The instances cited are pretty clearly at the extreme end of the spectrum, and should be dealt with as such. For everything else, people should relax just a bit more. Live and let live. And if you still have an issue, be an adult about it, and just let them know your concerns. You’d be amazed at how effective it is.
Despite all this, I still love apartment living. Wouldn’t have it any other way.
Now, if there was just some way of making the person in my unit block who keeps on throwing pizza boxes in the recycling instead of normal garbage…
25/01/2011 at 2:21 pm #12386Just discovered last week that pizza boxes ARE allowed in recycling – as long as they don't still have bits of pizza in them. One less thing for me to grumble about.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Smoke gets in your eyes › Current Page