Flat Chat Strata Forum Common Property Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #8112

    ConfusedRecently we have been informed that there is a leak in the water access pipe which is across the road from our block of units and clearly on the road side of our meter. I have always had the belief that the repair of a water pipe where the leak is on the street side of the water meter is the responsibility of the water supplier, in this case Hunter Water. That is confirmed on the Hunter Water website. However, it appears that because the pipe is more than 40cm in diameter the cost of repair falls to us, the owners of the block of units. How fair is that? I would think that the pipe is over the 40cm limit BECAUSE it is required to supply 24 individual units with water and a smaller pipe would not be able to do that job effectively. Hunter Water gets revenue from each of those 24 unit owners BUT is not responsible for the cost of the repair of the pipe. A private plumber is needed to do the job as Hunter Water will not. The cost is considerable being $13000.00 at best and another $7000.00 if they have to dig up the road. It seems this is now the norm….. comments and way forward welcome.

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #15463
    Whale
    Flatchatter

      The pipe that you’re referring to would have been originally necessary to bring the Water Utility’s supply to the block of land where your Plan is now located, and it would have been installed by a Plumbing Contractor engaged by the Builder / Developer. 

      So in the view of that Water Utility (Hunter Water in this case), the Owners Corporation of a Strata Development is now expecting them to accept responsibility for all on-going maintenance, repairs, and replacement of a section of underground pipework of an unknown standard, that was installed by “others”, and which currently services a single development via a single water meter.

      This has been a bone of contention between Water Utilities and property owners for many years, with one argument being that in most instances (but not all, and not recently) the old Water Boards supervised the construction of these “main-to-meter” installations, and should therefore be prepared to take-over the ongoing maintenance / repairs of the completed works. A counter-argument was that if the pipe supplied a single Development, it was private, and that the installing plumber was not Contracted to the Water Utility.

      Anyway, as you have now found out the compromise position was that the Water Utility can at its discretion take-over the responsibility for maintaining main-to-meter pipework having a “small diameter” (in your case <40mm), on the basis that these small-scale installations could not be as easily be “mucked-up” by plumbing contractors.

      So it’s going to cost each Owner in your Plan $500; not the answer you want, but hopefully you’ll now better understand the rationale behind your Water Utility’s position. 

      #15440

      Thanks for such a detailed reply. I do understand what you have said but have been informed that our position of having to pay for these repairs is due to a change in policy which took place on the quiet really, last year. Believe me I am not suggesting we get something for nothing BUT surly the cost would be more manageable if the water board undertook the repairs and charged us for part of it. It hardly seems fair that we have to pay for the supply line for a product which we also are charged for!
      Where does the responsibility of the supplier stop. Even if we use NO water at all we are charged for the supply to our lot BUT as this law now stands hunter water is not responsible to upkeep the supply line,

      #15474
      Whale
      Flatchatter

        Sorry “powers“, but I really can’t give you a response that you’ll be satisfied with, however I will say that:

        1. you definitely wouldn’t want Hunter Water to do and charge for the work ($$);
        2. Hunter Water’s responsibility ends at the point where your Plan’s water line connects to theirs
        3. you and other Proprietors would each pay about $20pa for the water supply’s availability if none of you used water, and
        4. what each of you does use costs about $0.002 / litre.

        Ask Hunter Water for some advice on the options to rectify the leakage, and make sure that you ask about local companies who undertake internal re-lining of water supply pipelines; depending upon the topography that process may be much cheaper option for your Owners Corporation.

        Good luck with it all!

        #15491
        DosMiklm
        Flatchatter


          @Whale
          said:
          Sorry “powers“, but I really can’t give you a response that you’ll be satisfied with, however I will say that:

          1. you definitely wouldn’t want Hunter Water to do and charge for the work ($$);
          2. Hunter Water’s responsibility ends at the point where your Plan’s water line connects to theirs
          3. you and other Proprietors would each pay about $20pa for the water supply’s availability if none of you used water, and
          4. what each of you does use costs about $0.002 / litre.

          Ask Hunter Water for some advice on the options to rectify the leakage, and make sure that you ask about local companies who undertake internal re-lining of water supply pipelines; depending upon the topography that process may be much cheaper option for your Owners Corporation.

          Good luck with it all!

          Nice!! Thanks! 

           
          #15509

          Hi there it does seem that I am seeking to receive an answer that I am not going to receive…and I must have had a brain freeze to suggest that Hunter Water fix the problem and charge us…..however my point is and has always been that were we a single dwelling ie a house owner, then the conditions would be quite different ie Hunter Water would repair the leak at their cost. It is because we are a block of units (that the pipe is a bigger diameter) and that the cost falls to us. Given that the units are about 30 years old the work would have originally been done by or under the supervision of the Water Board.

        Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

        Flat Chat Strata Forum Common Property Current Page