Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
Jimmy-T wrote
“See my previous comment about by-laws. ”
Yes fair point Jimmy, It makes sense to inform the strata committee so that there isn’t a mass migration at one time. Also owners and residents should be aware if there are any by-laws restricting times and days where moving furniture and large items should be restricted for the comfort and consideration of all residents. I was more referring to the suggestion in Loco’s post that the strata committee seemed to require to discuss and approve people moving in and out of the scheme which would appear to be somewhat orwelenan.
Im a strong believer of consideration, co-operation and common sense, in strata however these appear to be somewhat dated sentiments 🙂
Thanks Jimmy,
Although the NTC was issued as a result of a vote at an AGM, and therefore I would have thought all owners would be aware that there was a breach, you are correct. It is best not to open a can of worms by double dipping and going down this path. I guess the tendency for investors to be uninterested in the goings on in their strata schemes, and the behavior of tenants, unless it directly affects them is commonplace and I just have to accept that..I have followed your advice and purchased Snooper (software) that has a number of nifty features including triggering a recording when noise exceeds a defined threshold (can be set in -dbm). I can highly recommend software such as this as it timestamps all recordings and arranges them neatly into folders delineated my day and month. I have also invited friends to come and witness the situation on various occasions and I am in the process of having stat decs furnished. I am also keeping a detailed diary as advised. I will let the forum know of how this turns out as you have expressed a desire for posters to, if possible keep the community abreast of the outcome of forum posts.
This has been going on for over 3 years now and needs to be put to rest. This isn’t my first rodeo in Strata..
Interestingly one comment I received from someone purportedly via the Community Justice Center is that “Residents are allowed to make as much noise as they like as long as it is between 7am and 11pm”. I know this statement to be fertilizer for a fact.
Kind regards
Andyj
Hi,
To my knowledge unless you are living in a prison no.. You can move whenever you want. One caveat would be as long as there is someone there to move the truck if necessary and that it isn’t parked unattended for long periods of time. Sounds like you are leaving some lovely neighbors behind… jokingly I sayHi All,
The Strata Manager has contacted the tenants agent. The tenants agent says that she denies making any noise and does not want to discuss it further.
Looks like it is FT then NCAT.
As the OC wont support I want to take them to NCAT for failing to enforce by-law breaces. You mentioned there is a part of The SSMA that says that owners corps have to enforce by-law breachesCould someone please point me to the section of the act that relates to this
ThanksThanks Jimmy,
It truly baffles me as to why after a many polite requests over several years people will simply ignore your pleas for some respite from their gymnasium like activities, kung-fooing the bathroom to death ,and frequently running and jumping about when they are well aware it makes a huge noise for the people living below them. Naturally I don’t mind a bit of noise here and there as this is strata living, but when they keep Sydney airport hours each day and the noise is every 10 min or less it drives you nuts. What floors me as you say is when they ignore a notice to comply and basically say “bring it on”. Last night I videoed with my phone sequels of watch me mummy as the child hammered the floor with something that was very solid and bounced several times for over 30minThe difficulty I face pursuing this is I don’t have the wider support of the owners not affected by this. They are afraid of incurring costs as they are investors, you may recall we went down this path 10 years ago and incurred significant expense. The other member of the strata committee is almost completely deaf, needs hearing aids and is more interested in simply being on the committee. Last AGM she wandered off after voting herself onto the committee and left myself and the strata manager to finish up the agenda.
I know the Tribunal path can take over 12 months to complete, is very expensive if lawyers are involved and is a lottery as to whether of not you will prevail. Of course if we get new neighbors who knows if they will be any better.The owner of the lot above is very hostile to anyone who was involved in him losing his precious cheap timber floor, although it is still installed in the dining area and is the worst part of above.
Alas despair has set inWhat would you do in my case?
As I mentioned at the beginning of this thread I had the double whammy of the upstairs owner installing timber flooring followed immediately by an extremely noisy and active family taking up residence. The owner was ordered to treat the floor so as to not transmit noise likely to disturb my peaceful enjoyment. He did install carpet but very cheap carpet. We eventually got rid of the noisy tenants. I have had new noisy tenants above for 3 years now. I have been advised by our strata manager that taking the owner for an excessively nosy floor would likely fail. He has instead issued the tenants with a notice to comply with by-law 1. His wording was shocking, but he assures me that it will stick in a Tribunal.
The tenants have taken the notice to comply as an act of war and have seriously upped the ante. The slamming of doors and stomping about are appealing. Unfortunately my other neighbor who is also on the strata committee is not overly interested and thinks I am over reacting. She is mostly deaf and cant hear the noise, and also struggles to hear me when I am talking to her.
With little support in the building I have been advised that a tribunal hearing would likely be unsuccessful and I would simply make enemies of my neighbors. My friends say let it go, sell up and move out.
Not withstanding the expense of selling and repurchasing into what I fear may be jumping from the frying pan into the fire, I live in a nice area close to all the shops etc and all my friends are in the same area.
What would you do in this dilemma??Im going to make a bit of a punt on this one, mostly as I am keenly aware if things go before NCAT it “can” end up as an interpretation of the act made of the member of the day.
s108 I believe is intended for more substantial changes to common property, such as a retaining wall etc, whereas s110 is for minor changes as Jimmy has indicated. A screen that cannot be seen and presumably isn’t a more substantial modification would likely be covered by s110. I would therefore lean toward Jimmy’s argument because.
s110..
(8) Section 108 does not apply to minor renovations carried out in accordance with this section.
Yes Tina is correct. My neighbor lit a candle and placed it in the window. She then for some inexplicable reason closed the curtains and left the room. The rest is history so I guess in a way the damage was caused by negligence?.
Nice to see our Guru scotlandx is still with the forum. His advice is always accurate and sagely 🙂The case in WA is a bit concerning as we also have a “Mr Pratt” in residence in our strata. There have been a number of disputes with this owner over several decades where they have harassed residents, posted incoherent/rambling defamatory notes via email to owners or left notes on doors and the strata notice board. This individual is also been suspected to smear peoples washing with excrement and throw such material on residents balconies. Much of this is behavior is documented in strata records and therefore is (regrettably) searchable by a prospective buyer. Before I purchased some years ago my lawyer did a search of the strata records and noted some disputes regarding this individual. The extent of the behavior did not become apparent to me until some time after I moved in. My question is, would that fact that there are such records with our strata satisfy the requirement to disclose. Do the particulars of the WA case apply in N.S.W in such that is there such a clause as sighted by the judge that is included in most NSW sales agreements?
Clause 10.2 of the General Conditions relevantly provides:
Representation and Warranty
Except to the extent disclosed in writing by the Seller to the Buyer before the Contract Date, or as otherwise specified in the Contract, the Seller represents and warrants to the Buyer at the Contract Date and at the date of Settlement as follows.
…
(c) Except for anything:
(1) apparent on an inspection of the Strata Lot and the parcel of which it forms part; or
(2) registered or recorded on the Strata Plan; or
(3) specified in the Strata Company by-laws,
the Seller does not know of anything which will materially affect the Buyer’s use or enjoyment of the Strata Lot or of the common property comprised in the Strata Scheme. (emphasis added)
I totally agree with you on this Jimmy. I was a tenant for 12 years in various Sydney apartments, Most of the time I found the owners to be pleasant, however there was always the unspoken “understanding” that owners had all the rights and power in the complex and tenants were merely renters with few rights.
When owners would have late night parties, it was frowned upon for any of the tenants to raise the fact that they were disturbed, however if a tenant had a party the resident owners were all over them with threats of contacting the landlord and getting you evicted.
Now I am an owner I strongly believe that the tenants have the same rights and responsibilities as the owners in our building do. Some owners in our building feel that they have sway of how the building should be run regardless of what tenants and some owners may think. You are right Jimmy the battle is between decent people and dickheads.
In the suburb I live in there are a plethora of parks and other public areas where children can run, play and holler their lungs out. I believe it is healthy for children to get some vigorous exercise. Our strata block also has a covered area that was designed for children to quietly play in when the weather was not conducive to outdoor activities. I am not sure in the current day whether of not our insurance would cover this…..
Strata living (and increasingly suburban living) means that we are increasingly living cheek to jowl. Having children running around outside and gleefully yelling is one thing. Having the same coupled with the sounds of stampeding elephants running overhead is another, especially early in the mornings or late in the evenings..
Residents of strata blocks should be aware that the noise associated with children (or those acting like children) does carry, especially at night. In a healthy strata complex residents can talk with each other and these issues usually can be settled with a chat and a coffee.
I believe it is important to consider other residents and moderate your and your children’s behaviour so that you are not driving your fellow neighbours bonkers
@JimmyT said:
@Dragandeewhy said:
If the kids are small up to 12-13 years old of course there is going to be shouting and yelling. What would you expect? What for you is loud daily noise for somebody else is just daily activity.
So, does this mean we have to put up with any level of noise created by children? If not, where do we draw the line?
Is it unreasonable to expect parents who have chosen to enjoy the benefits of strata living to consider their neighbours and moderate the behaviour of their children?
Or don’t normal standards apply to kids and their parents?
I’m not taking sides on this – I’m just curious to know what others think.
Jimmy
Hi All,
I have read this thread with much reflection, as I and my 2 other neighbours in our wing of an 8 unit strata block have been living with daily disturbing noise from the other neighbour in our wing for 3 years now.
You all raise extremely good points in your posts.
Whilst some occasional noise from neighbours is to be expected, and tolerated, in any strata scheme. There is a difference between occasional neighbour noise and disturbing and intrusive noise.
The noise doesn’t necessary always need to be loud, as the dull thuds of people walking about/ running or slamming doors can be clearly audible and if frequent (say every few minutes) can become a nuisance. It is the “nature” of the disturbance that is often the issue.
I agree that the best initial approach is to discuss the noise with the offending party early and directly. Don’t be confronting or accusing, but do describe what you are hearing and the impact it is having on you. Fair Trading NSW recommends this as the initial approach. Hopefully your neighbour(s) are reasonable people and understand that the noise is having a big impact on you.
Sadly sometimes this approach doesn’t work, your neighbours ignore your requests and the next step is to either issue a notice to comply or attempt mediation via a community justice centre or Fair Trading.
Again sometimes this fails and your neighbour tells you to get stuffed at mediation or ignores the notice to comply and carries on their merry way disturbing you day and night.
Step 3 in our case was to go for adjudication. This as Jimmy mentioned can take months. If you get a successful outcome the other party is almost guaranteed to appeal and if they get legal representation (sometimes pro-bono) you then have massive legal costs to bear. During this process the neighbour will often continue to behave as they always have.
What I have learnt is that sometimes you cannot prevail when your neighbour is determined to live however they please and what could have been a happy relationship between neighbours deteriorates badly. We are now at the stage if we politely knock on their door and ask that they stop slamming doors and bashing furniture, they call the police and complain that we are harassing them.
Sometimes the only solution as I have see too many times in this forum is to simply sell up and hope that you don’t encounter another neighbour who thinks that they have the god given right to behave however they please
As they say it only takes one bad apple to spoil the barrel
Hi Jimmy and Gurus,
We have engaged legal advice as has the respondent in a noise case against the tenants who live above us. We intend to send the owner a letter about his obligations under s117(1)(a).
In a post by Jimmy there was a reference to a district court case where a resident took the owner of a residence to the district court about a bunch of short term tenants partying all the time and got orders against the owner. Our lawyer was intrigued and would like to do the same. Can you please provide me a link to the case or article so I can pass it on to our legal team.
Many thanks
andyj
Hi Flat-Chat community,
Our owners corporation is going through the same experience as dnighttime.
In brief:
Feb 2012- Timber floor installed above and new neighbors move in. Appalling noise results severely disrupting all residents in west wing of the strata complex.
May2012-July2013 protracted battle with owner to address breach of by-law 14. Favorable adjudication Jan 2013 which also recognizes some of the noise is not related to the floor and is the tenants themselves. Owner appeals, we go to a directions hearing May. July tribunal orders that owner complies with orders. Owner installs cheap carpet. Noise reduced from deafening to frequent and annoying.
Jan2014 Owner corp seeks orders against tenant to comply with by-law 1 and s117(1)(a) SSMA 1996. Adjudication July 2014 in favor of owners corp. Residents of west wing contact council and request noise abatement direction. Granted and in force until Oct 2014. Residents of west wing have politely approached tenant 4 times as a group in person over preceding 3 years asking nicely to please consider neighboring residents especially between 10pm and 7am. On last visit the tenant of the offending lot accuses the 3 other residents of the west wing of harassment and calls the police seeking AVO’s. Tenant speaks to police in English who advise us not to approach her again.
Owners corp seek orders from tribunal requesting penalties for breach of orders. Hearing held early Sept. Tenant suddenly cannot speak English and needs an interpreter. States that she could not understand request for mediation as an excuse for not attendance, didn’t understand the orders handed down by the tribunal and is bewildered as to why she is there. She also states that she does not have any knowledge of the laws or her rights.
Tribunal member asks that we talk with her about our issues. Strata Manager states that we have all had conversations with her, she can speak English and has 2 children at high school that do not need translators in class all day. Strata Manager also mentions police advice to all other residents not to approach her. Member repeats that it would be preferable for the parties to enter into discussions. We ask how if she cannot understand English and we are not permitted to contact her. Member adjourns case and states that the onus in on the owners corporation to establish that she is breaching the by laws despite us already having orders from the tribunal that she is in breach of the by laws. Member states that not all noise is excessive noise and we must understand this, despite the adjudicators orders in July stating that the tribunal is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that she is making excessive noise. All up hearing lasts 15min and we are dismissed. Outside tribunal the other party suddenly has learnt to speak English again.
Owner refuses to evict tenants despite all the evidence we have and the orders we have against the tenant. Strata Manager has never seen a noise issue get to this stage. He said that at least once a month his agency gets evictions from real estate agents in cases like this.
Legal advise from a friend is that they have had some very good legal advice to play the language and race card and that despite any orders we get they will continue to ignore them. The owner is a relative and lives overseas and supports the tenant fully. Is there any way we can put some heat on the owner as it appears that these people will fight to the death to “exercise their right to live as they please, even at 3am every day” and will not move for anyone. Next step penalties from council for breach of noise abatement direction. Stat decs from all affected residents 3 years of noise logs from 2 (one resident has given up due to the time this has taken and works night shift so can sleep during the day)After 3 years of this I am almost stuffed.
Thoughts, advice, prayers requested
One nervous wreck andyj
Hi PatriciaSC,
Could you please post the URL link to the precedent you found on the AustLii web site. I would like to see if I can use this
Cheers
-
AuthorReplies