Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: An owner wants to change unit entitlements #77504
    citychic
    Flatchatter

      I have a 3 bdrm single level villa with  13/100 UE in a complex of 10. There are 2 townhouses who each have 12/100 UE and the largest square meterage and Biggest footprint. There are 7 x 2bdrm single level villas of varying square meterage each  with 9/100 UE.

      I do not have the largest square meterage despite having the rating of 13/100.  This affords me nothing other than the highest fees.

      I believe the unit entitlements were set incorrectly when the strata plan was initially set up forty years ago.

      Im interested in any comments or suggestions /ideas about UE’s where in a complex of 10 every premise has different square meterage and I think should be re surveyed to reflect living space for levies.

      I welcome any flatchatters ideas/suggestions/recommendations.

      in reply to: An owner wants to change unit entitlements #77501
      citychic
      Flatchatter

        <!–more–>Im very interested in this post. I have 13/100 in a complex of 10.  8 are single level villas with 7 of them holding 9/100 each and 2 are townhouses holding 12/100 each.  Mine has 3 bdrms and the 9 have 2 bdrms.

        All premises have varying square meterage. The 2 townhouses have the largest square meterage and the largest footprint yet hold 12/100 each.

        I think they were initially rated with mine given the highest UE based solely on number of bdrms highest then townhouses then 2 bdrms.  I do not have the largest living space even with the 3rd bdrm.

        It will be an unpopular move to upset the status quo, but How do I go about getting a change to UE’s to reflect the differences in square meterage in each Of the 10 Units in the complex which would be a fairer distribution of levies. ?

        I welcome your Comments /suggestions from flatchatters who may have  encountered similar situation or pros and cons.

         

      Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)